Topic: smoothing the goal halo ?
One can easily see sides of the halo.
They are more visible ingame.
Can we increase the side number?

You are not logged in. Please login or register.
One can easily see sides of the halo.
They are more visible ingame.
Can we increase the side number?

I'm worrying a little about performance issues with all this smoothing. Does anybody have any older machines to try to do some benchmarking with?
If it's not going to cost us too much, why not smooth them out?
I have access only to computers with crappy hardware, and I also do all of my Neverball development stuff on one of them. So far I haven't observed any impact on performance with these new curves. The visual improvement is worth it in many cases, though I do worry that it might be getting a bit extreme, like in this case...
I think the visual improvement is great. I haven't had a real chance to have a good squiz, but I'm definitely impressed with what I've seen so far.
After thinking about it though, I agree with parasti. Is this taking it all a bit far?
make it switchable in neverballrc - that way you can disable/enable at will, like aniso and aa!
Be aware, however, that once you start making things smoother, your standards as to what passes as "smooth" rise quickly.
One can easily see sides of the halo.
They are more visible ingame.
Can we increase the side number?
Hehe... 
make it switchable in neverballrc - that way you can disable/enable at will, like aniso and aa!
This option already exists: Geometry High/Low.
Last edited by Elviz (2008-09-29 04:17:04)
Hehe...
You were right 
Nevertheless, this is coherent as the game has to be as uniform as we can, so the level of smoothness should be quite the same everywhere in the game.
I've been thinking about this a little, and I'm feeling that, goal smoothness might be better solved through some other means.
We never actually see the faces of the cylinder (the halo could be a rectangular billboard and - so long as it only faced us along its horizontal axis - we'd have trouble telling the difference if we couldn't see where it joined the pad), and I'm wondering whether we could come up with another means of tidying up where it intersects the pad that doesn't involve creating faces that we never actually get to see.
I say double the sides and leave it at that - it's not like the player will notice it when he's careening at high speed into the goal...
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 8 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.